LATEST NEWS

New AUGUST Courses to help mem...
UNISON Birmingham Branch 25 years of Learning at Work August 2018   UNI...
Tue, 22 May 2018
Unison Conference reports
 Birmingham Branch members attended the Local Government Conference and Nat...
Tue, 17 July 2018
Win a prize and keep in touch!...
We need to be able to contact our members, so to make sure we're up to date on y...
Tue, 10 July 2018
Council talk about NEW cuts ?
Birmingham City Council announced the contents of the repsonse to the Kerslake R...
Tue, 03 July 2018
Hot weather advice
Labour & European Law Review Weekly Issue 577 04 July 2018 Acas, the concil...
Tue, 10 July 2018
Win free tickets!
UNISON Birmingham Branch LGBT Self Organised Group are pleased to offer the chan...
Tue, 03 July 2018
Get that job!
 For Unison members in Strategic Services Business Support/PSS Members we a...
Tue, 26 June 2018
Unison NEC International repor...
At the recent UNISON NEC National Delegates Conference their were number of...
Tue, 26 June 2018

Save Our Neighbourhood Offices

A NEIGHBOURHOOD ADVICE AND HOMELESS SERVICE

FIT FOR BIRMINGHAM

In December 2015 the Council is commencing consultation on the principles of a new Neighbourhood Advice and Homeless Service.

The current five main Neighbourhood Offices will be replaced by just two in Northfield and Erdington.

The Homeless Service that is based in four of these offices will be replaced by just one Homeless Service in Newtown.

UNISON does not think this service is adequate for a city the size of Birmingham, with a population of over a million people. The removal of a Neighbourhood Office service from Newtown, Saltley and Sparkbrook looks like the city is abandoning the most deprived and ethnically diverse areas of the city.

Budget driven

Whilst the city reels from Tory imposed budget cuts, the Council will be failing in its promise to defend the most vulnerable, if it gives these proposals the green light. The Neighbourhood Office budget was cut by 50% last year and now faces a further 50% cut. Out of a Council budget of billions, the proposed cut of just over a million may not sound significant, but it will have a devastating impact on a service that at its peak had 43 offices.

Slowly the Council has closed the doors to its services, so that if you have a problem with Housing, Council Tax, Benefits or other Council Services there is virtually no where you can go for a face to face service. With the emphasis on online and phone services the citizens that miss out are the most vulnerable, least articulate, or those with language issues.

Many people slip through the safety net; evicted when they have an entitlement to full Housing Benefit that numerous phone calls have failed to resolve. This largely results in homelessness and unrecoverable rent arrears. Is this the kind of service that we can be proud of?

False alternatives

Don’t be fooled into thinking the placing or one or two staff with a Letting Team, or reliance on the Voluntary Sector, will plug the gaps left by these closures. The Voluntary Sector itself is shedding staff and does not have the access to Council systems to assist in resolving problems quickly and efficiently.

There has to be a way to fund four or five offices that maintains some kind of service to the public, city wide.

Homeless Hell

The idea of just one homeless centre for the entire city, conjures up an image of bedlam. Homeless families, Domestic Violence victims, individuals with mental health problems or substance abuse, all crammed into one building in substantial numbers, poses a real risk to the safety of public and staff.

One of the reasons put forward for this proposal is to ensure a consistent service. However a consistent service flows from good staff training and a clear and consistent management approach, not from being under one roof.

Few other major cities have just one Homeless Centre. Liverpool has nine, Glasgow has five, Cardiff has one Home Options Centre plus five Community Hubs.

Leeds is championed as being a large city with one centre, but it also has 3 outreach surgeries. Manchester has one for a population less than half the size of Birmingham, but if you include the local authorities that make up Greater Manchester (Trafford and Salford), you have three for a population that is still less than Birmingham.

In a City the size of Birmingham travelling to just one location can be difficult if you have a disability, young children or have no money. The concentration of such an important service in one centre seems to go against the Council mantra of decentralisation and local services.

 

WHAT YOU CAN DO

If you are opposed to these proposals these are the things you can do:

NEWSLETTER

OUR NETWORK

facebook Twitter You Tube

OTHER NEWS

The West Midlands is full of diversity but its lea...
Last year the West Midlands Combined Authority set up a Leadership Commission to address the under-representation of people of all backgrounds in lead...
Read More